Souls (Fields) Time Space

Quantum Fields Theory: The Most Beautiful Theory in Physics !

Matthieu Giroux — 2026-09-16T06:42:26Z

https://www.youtube.com/embed/eoStndCzFhg

Quantum Fields Theory: The Most Beautiful Theory in Physics !

CHAPTERS:
0:00 - Historical perspective of modern physics
1:50 - The advent of Quantum Mechanics
5:00 - The problems with quantum mechanics
6:52 - What is Quantum Field Theory?
9:25 - How QFT explains force mediation and decay
10:53 - How QFT is also incomplete
11:44 - The most beautiful theory in the universe!
12:41 - Further study with Brilliant

SUMMARY:
Quantum field theory or QFT is the basis of the best theory we have in physics today to explain nearly everything, called the Standard Model of particle physics. What is Quantum Field theory? Why is it necessary? How is it different than quantum mechanics?

Classical mechanics indicates that an orbiting electron creates electromagnetic radiation which means that it would constantly lose energy, and fall to the nucleus. This does not happen. Quantum Mechanics solved this problem by showing that electrons travel in quantized orbits at their lowest energy state, and that they do not orbit but exist as a clould around the nucleus.

In quantum mechanics, objects are wavefunctions described by the Schrodinger equation. The location of a particle is unknown until the moment of measurement. We cannot know where it is beforehand, only the probability of finding it at any specific location.

This is a great model but it also has some problems. First of all, quantum mechanics is not relativistic. It will give you the wrong result if the quantum object is moving close the speed of light. The practical result of this is that as it doesn't incorporate a speed limit, the speed of light, needed to make causality work. It allows for two measurements to influence each other faster than light. This would mean that there would be some reference frame in which the future could influence the past, breaking causality.

A second problem with quantum mechanics is that it only tells you how a particle evolves over time. It does not tell you how it is created or annihilated. So it can't account for things like beta decay, due to the weak nuclear force, where a neutron transforms into a proton, an electron and an antineutrino.

This is where quantum field theory explains things that quantum mechanics cannot explain on its own. So what is quantum field theory? QFT a mathematical framework that combines classical field theory, special relativity, and quantum mechanics There is a field for every particle of the standard model.

All of these fields extend out in all of spacetime. The fields are always there and exist everywhere including inside your body. Although they exist everywhere and you can't see them, they are not nothing. They are teeming with virtual particles. These are particle-antiparticle pairs that get created and destroyed constantly.

We can visualize these fields as a kind of ocean. Just like the ocean always has some turbulence, the fields always have a kind of turbulence even in their ground state of minimal energy. This turbulence is due to virtual particle creation and annihilation. In these turbulent seas, if there is enough energy, a larger wave can be created which CAN be measured. These are the real particles.

Energy can be transferred between two fields via a mediating boson field. This is considered an interaction or a force. Matter particles can't interact on their own without a mediating boson.

So while in quantum mechanics there is no way for the neutron to split its energy into 3 different particles – a proton, electron and antineutrino, in quantum field theory this can be done via energy exchange between the fields. Although the number of particles may change, the total energy is always conserved. In other words, the energy of the fields is the same before and after the energy exchange. So by having quantum fields we can mathematically account for and model creation and annihilation of particles, as well as the mechanism of force exchange.

How to reconcile relativity with quantum mechanics ? What is spin ? Where does the electric charge come from ? All these answers in 15 minutes !

https://www.youtube.com/embed/MmG2ah5Df4g

Quantum Field Theory visualized

0:00 - Introduction
1:52 - Field and spin
4:38 - Conserved quantities
6:02 - Quantum field
7:39 - Standard model
10:15 - Interactions
13:58 - Conclusion

More :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_field_theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry_(physics)

Quantum mechanics and general relativity both...

Matthieu Giroux — 2026-09-16T06:33:42Z

Quantum mechanics and general relativity both describe nature with astonishing precision, but when we try to combine them using the same perturbative tools that work so well in quantum electrodynamics, the method breaks down.

In QED, the small value of the fine-structure constant ensures that higher-order corrections remain tiny, allowing us to make incredibly accurate predictions. For gravity, however, the effective coupling grows with the square of energy. As we approach the Planck scale, loop corrections become unsuppressed, renormalisation fails, and smooth spacetime stops being a useful description.

This does not mean physics itself collapses; it means our current mathematical framework reaches its limits. At low energies, quantum gravity works perfectly as an effective theory, giving small, well-defined corrections to Newton's law. But at extremely high energies, perturbation theory loses predictive power, hinting that spacetime may be emergent from something deeper.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/yTEPm5d6mrI

YouTube

Resources and References

Lectures on Particle Physics — David Tong
https://davidtong.org/teaching/particle-physics/.

Quantum Gravity at the Planck Length — Joseph Polchinski (SLAC Summer Institute Lectures)
https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9812104

Particles, Feynman Diagrams and All That — Michael Daniel (IOP Physics Education)
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9120/41/2/001
https://faculty.washington.edu/seattle/physics541/%202010-reading/diagrams-3.pdf

Gravity as a Quantum Field Theory — Roberto Percacci (Symmetry)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/15/2/449

Quantum General Relativity and Effective Field Theory — John F. Donoghue
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09902

Introduction to Elementary Particles — David Griffiths (Wiley-VCH)
https://www.wiley.com/en-us/shop/general-physics/introduction-to-elementary-particles-2nd-revised-edition-p-9783527406012

String Theory (Cambridge Part III Lecture Notes) — David Tong
https://davidtong.org/teaching/string-theory/

How Do Feynman Diagrams Work? — James Robert Brown (Perspectives on Science)
https://direct.mit.edu/posc/article/26/4/423/15455/How-Do-Feynman-Diagrams-Work

Why Quantum Gravity is Hard — David Wakeham
https://hapax.github.io/physics/hacks/qgrav/

Quantum Gravity — Carlo Rovelli (Cambridge University Press)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/quantum-gravity/9EEB701AAB938F06DCF151AACE1A445D

Introduction to the Effective Field Theory Description of Gravity — John F. Donoghue
https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9512024

QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter — Richard Feynman (Princeton University Press sample)
https://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/i2352.pdf

The Basics of Quantum Electrodynamics — Donie O'Brien (Trinity College Dublin)
https://www.maths.tcd.ie/~donie/includes/QEDintro.pdf

Quantum Gravity in Everyday Life — C.P. Burgess (Living Reviews in Relativity)
https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311082

Two Dimensions of Time Explain Quantum Physics, Physicist Argues

Matthieu Giroux — 2026-09-16T06:18:05Z

You've probably heard that quantum mechanics is spooky, that measuring one particle instantly affects another across any distance. A physicist now says there's a reason: the universe doesn't have one dimension of time, but two. It sounds absurd, but he's got the maths and even a way to test it. Genius or nonsense? Let's take a look.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/8e_JSOxaEVQ

Two Dimensions of Time Explain Quantum Physics, Physicist Argues

Paper :
https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12457

Brain Really Uses Quantum Effects, New Study Finds

Matthieu Giroux — 2026-09-16T06:08:44Z

When Roger Penrose originally came out with the idea that the human brain uses quantum effects in microtubules and that was the origin of consciousness, many thought the idea was a little crazy. According to a new study, it turns out that Penrose was actually right… about the microtubules anyways. Let's have a look.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/R6G1D2UQ3gg

Brain Really Uses Quantum Effects, New Study Finds

https://www.youtube.com/embed/v1wqUCATYUA

Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics: How are they related?

00:00 Intro
00:34 Wigner and his friends
03:39 Enter von Neumann
05:51 Problems with the Wigner-vNeumann interpretation
07:37 Consciousness-induced wave-function collapse
09:38 Consciousness-influenced wave-function collapse
14:27 Penrose and Hamaroff
15:25 Summary
16:02 Check out my Quantum Mechanics Course

The paper from Chalmers and McQueen is here:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.02314

Wigner's essay is here:
https://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/wigner/Wigner_Remarks.pdf

The 2012 paper about the influence of consciousness on the double-slit experiment is here:
https://www.esalq.usp.br/lepse/imgs/conteudo_thumb/Consciousness-and-the-double-slit-interference-pattern-Six-experiments.pdf

The criticism on their statistical analysis is here:
https://philpapers.org/rec/WALRCF

Physicists Find Missing Link Between Quantum Mechanics and Gravity

Matthieu Giroux — 2026-09-16T05:56:27Z

Recently, a pair of researchers made a massive breakthrough in the foundations of physics. In their paper, they describe how gravity is an emergent property. More specifically, they say that the origin of gravity is entropy. And not just any entropy, but the entropy of quantum fields. How big is this really? Let's take a look.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/IxmTqIkToTg

Physicists Say They Know the Origin of Gravity

Paper : https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/lmq8-nsty

We know that Einstein's general relativity is, strictly speaking, wrong. That's because it doesn't account for quantum effects despite the fact that those effects really do exist. In a new paper, physicists say they've re-done Einstein's equations with quantum effects taken into account. According to them, there's a “clear difference” between the two. Let's take a look at what they've done and what it could mean for physics.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/912vQr6ulNk

Physicists Find Missing Link Between Quantum Mechanics and Gravity

Paper : https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/w1sd-v69d

Over the past few decades, the idea that gravity is not a fundamental interaction but is instead caused by the increase of entropy has become increasingly popular in the world of physics. Today, we have a paper from a group of physicists who claim that entropic gravity might be the result of space being full of qubits. Let's take a look.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/qNt2bhPS9ts

This Paper Might Change How We See Gravity

Paper : https://journals.aps.org/prx/abstract/10.1103/y7sy-3by1

Physicists Prove That Universe is or is not a Simulation

Matthieu Giroux — 2026-09-16T05:50:44Z

The Simulation Hypothesis is the idea that our universe is actually an algorithm being run on a mysterious supercomputer. In a recent paper, a group of physicists say they've disproved this theory by using Goedel's theorem. Let's take a look.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/k6AddqLIbJA

Physicists Prove That Universe is not a Simulation

Paper : https://news.ok.ubc.ca/2025/10/30/ubco-study-debunks-the-idea-that-the-universe-is-a-computer-simulation/

Some people seem obsessed with the idea that we live in some sort of computer simulation. One physicist has gone as far as publishing a paper pushing that idea, claiming that the existence of gravity might prove that the simulation theory is indeed correct. Let's take a look.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/ArUTSOZcn0E

Gravity Proves That We Live In A Simulation, Physicist Claims

Paper : https://pubs.aip.org/aip/adv/article/15/4/045035/3345217/Is-gravity-evidence-of-a-computational-universe

3D Time Theory Discuss

Matthieu Giroux — 2026-09-16T05:43:55Z

This is defence to some of the critiques of my 3D time hypothesis that I am developing. Since you see this video, the follow up manuscript is about to be published and may provide clarifications.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/3T1YEQvN3_c

3D Time Theory Defence

Critiques :

https://www.youtube.com/embed/LWzK6nITCK0

3D Time Theory Critics

Time Has 3 Dimensions, New Theory Flips Reality, Space Becomes Secondary

Matthieu Giroux — 2026-09-16T05:32:21Z

A radical new theory from researchers at Warsaw & Oxford, and further developed by Gunther Kletetschka at UAF, proposes time isn't just one dimension—it might be three-dimensional, while space emerges as a byproduct of time's structure.

Why This Is Mind‑Blowing:
Three axes of time could explain quantum mysteries like entanglement, superposition, and particle mass.

Kletetschka's math reproduces real particle masses (e.g. electron & top quark) with incredible accuracy—bringing testability to the theory.

Flipping spacetime from 3+1 to 1+3 could be the key to unifying quantum mechanics and gravity, solving physics' biggest puzzle.

What You'll See in This Video:
Simple animations of 3D time axes and how space emerges

Interviews & quotes from physicists exploring the theory's implications

Discussion on experimental testability—and how we might prove time has extra dimensions.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/u8SqLTHeR7Q

Time Has 3 Dimensions - New News Vlog

Source of the video

Time and Space Theory Concept by a scientific VLOG

Matthieu Giroux — 2026-09-16T04:12:14Z

New quantum and temporal model of the universe :

You have confirmed in this last video, which drives quantum modeling, that consciousness or the soul create time. In the previous 2, an astrophysicist tested and verified my thought experiment on the soul slowing down time without quoting me, because I am not an astrophysicist but am interested in the bugs of science such as the displacement of atoms.

I questioned at school everything that seemed abnormal to me in what I was learning, especially in science. Also, I was studying to be able to use what I was learning, not for a simple short-term performance, although a lot of what I was learning seemed unproven to me, so unnatural. For example, third-grade geometry seemed more interesting to me than high school algebra.

I found it because I inform myself about the limits of the human being by questioning by nature what my parents taught me and especially because I simplified in a method called "How to write stories" allowed to review the pedagogy of the newspaper "Nouvelle Solidarité" belonging to the more wellknown Lyndon Larouche international network. I propose, through various ebooks and free slides to follow my truth-seeking's way.

I can be creative and focused at the same time by scientific passion. On the other hand, I memorize first names and uncrowded faces very poorly.

David Elbaz is not a theorist but an astronomy's uncoder. Jean-Pierre Petit is clearly less pretentious with Newton. Indeed, David only talks about Newton's error at the end, with the trajectory of Mercury that we could not calculate by universal gravitation, which has never been universal according to Kepler, Kepler's formulas making it possible to calculate mass as Newton's formula should do.

Jean-Pierre Petit indicates that his calculations do not take into account radio emissions, which could create particles or even matter, since matter creates itself. Otherwise, there would be no matter.

Jean-Pierre Petit wanted to use quantum field theory to modelize universe, with 3 fields at a point in universe. This quantum modeling or simulation should be Gunther Kletetschka's 3D time theory.

The scientist Aurélien Barrau prooves my mind's theory

Matthieu Giroux — 2026-09-16T03:55:32Z

A soul for our universe comes from Egyptians, Kepler followed by Edgar Poe (Eureka Chapter V). Time is slowed down by soul. Time is a regulation from soul. It is not about space-time but about souls-time-space (fields-time-space). I got ahead of dominant thought consisting about vacuum with nothing with particules'fusion creating atoms from waves.

Reaction to Aurélien Barrau's questioning after my answer :

In november 2018, there is a risk-taking from Aurélien Barrau, questioning his own time's theory in his thesis. He speaks about time and souls. He will later detail his scientific vision without it being completely metaphysical. An explanation :